Disclaimer: This is just the author’s opinion. Hope it’s a fun rant though.
According to the ancient Greeks, a person’s temperament could fall into one of four “buckets”: The outgoing, vivacious and fun-loving Sanguine; the bossy and highly ambitious Choleric, the gentle, slightly pessimistic and very meticulous Melancholic, and the laid-back, easy-going Phlegmatic.
Now, while I don’t like the thought of people falling into buckets, there is definitely something to that. The theory is based on real-life observation.
I’ve been following motivational and personal development programs, as well as working in Corporate for some years now; and what I notice more and more is how things too often get based on the Love of Lists.
There is technically nothing wrong with lists; they help us get through a series of tasks without forgetting, say, the Honey Crunch during shopping. But if one gives it a moment’s thought, a list is ourselves micro-managing ourselves. And if our day becomes all about lists, writing down what we want to do and writing down what we did, and writing down what we still have to accomplish…. somehow, my head is about to explode with lists.
How does each temperament respond to receiving a great idea?
The Sanguine is the optimist, the dreamer; in the Tarot (s)he is the Fool. (My favourite card by the way.) The Sanguine catches the most ideas, somewhat like a lightning conductor, and dreams them into big things. Can she transform them into reality? Well, you can be guaranteed she’ll try and nobody will be able to talk her out of it. Until she gets distracted by the next sparkly idea.
The Choleric is oftentimes a big-picture person. So if and when the Choleric has an idea that is in his esteem good enough to implement, you can bet your bottom it shall be implemented! And nothing will stand in the Choleric’s way (watch out or be flattened).
When inspiration strikes the Melancholic, the result is plans, more plans, and lists. A whole complex system of self-micromanagement, which becomes so big that he takes a step back, looks at it and gives up with a sigh, more often than not. Melancholics are also masters of procrastination, they fall into “analysis paralysis”.
And the Phleg? Well… if the Phlegmatic gets an idea, she’ll regard it with a bit of jadedness – is it worth taking the first step? What is the pay-off? Will it lead to greater comfort? Is the idea simple enough to implement? Having said that, when a Phleg decides it’s worth starting out, she’s usually unstoppable. Like Thomas the Tank Engine she’ll just keep going.
On NaNoWriMo we have had discussions about “plot planner” vs “seat-of-pantser”, concerning the writing styles. It’s essentially the same debate.
“Now, here’s the rub”, as Iain used to say:
We all have a bit of each temperament in us. We do tend to lean more strongly towards one or the other, (people around you will be able to tell you which one you “are); sometimes we “live” in a combination of two temperaments; but we also grow and develop, so it can even happen that we switch from one to the next.
But of all the temperaments, the only one that deals well with lists is the Melancholic. He loves lists. They are his playground. Lists, and structures, and totting up what he has done and what he wants to do. Scheduling every minute of the day.
The rest of us go a bit cuckoos having to live by such tiny micro-steps. Have you ever gone shopping with a shopaholic elderly aunt who can’t walk fast? Have you felt more tired than she did after 3 to 4 hours? It’s because you are having to put on the brakes all the time, working against your own muscles to slow yourself down to “keep down” with her. Shuffling is exhausting!
Living in lists and micro-schedules is a bit like that for the Sanguine and the Choleric, both of whom have high energy levels and want to run with an idea, not progress in micro-steps. The Phlegmatic sees the lists and schedules and baulks at the sheer amount of effort it will take. Only Melancholics thrive on lists.
“Growth”?
According to some, learning to set and adhere to lists and overscheduling is a growth and development process.
No – I don’t feel it is. (Any more than following Spartan-style self-torture learning to increase one’s pain endurance, on both a physical and emotional level). It’s not growth. It’s a sideways move.
I am thinking back to my grandfather, who was at age 84 still bossing his students around the stage producing operas, who still ran a full singing studio with a concert-style masterclass every winter, who at 82 jumped up onto a table to demonstrate a point to his students about something in stage craft – a move a lot of them couldn’t copy.
Did he live by lists? Ha! Did he have a schedule? Sure enough, to nail down when which student would arrive for their class, and so on; but for his personal life? Heck no! Did he accomplish great things over a lifetime? You bet!
Does Richard Branson live by lists and microscheduling? Did he, when he started Virgin Airlines, Virgin Records and all those other ventures he discussed in his original version of the book, “Screw It, Let’s Do It”? (I must get my original copy out of storage, the revised version is a completely different book.)
Remember, if you want to make big changes to your life:
You can’t micro-shuffle your way into a bigger version of your life. Bold innovation requires Boldness.
You can’t cross a chasm in two small jumps.